Добави мнение Мнения:6
| Taja mrusna evreiska lezbika zashto nikoga ne objavi nekoi evreiski ili amerikanski politik ili general v prestaplenie?????Samo FashistiKomunisti,Socialisti i vichki drugi koito ne sa tehni lakei sa prestapnici.Tja sigurno iska da mu pravi minet na tozi balkanski sin zdrav i jak.Edna li vech ne se nadjava na negovija hui kosmat. |
| THE CASE FOR DISENGAGEMENT Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Interview with Srdja Trifkovic (abbreviated transcript) WNTA Rockford, Chris Bowman Show Friday, March 16, 2001, 13:09 Central BOWMAN: Our guest today is Srdja Trifkovic, foreign affairs editor of Chronicles--a magazine published by The Rockford Institute. Dr. Trifkovic, is there a link between this morning's news that a Russian airliner has been hijacked in Turkey--apparently by two Chechens--and the ever escalating fighting in the Balkans? TRIFKOVIC: The common denominator is Islam. If you look at the map of the world, wherever a nation that is historically Muslim meets members of other cultures and other religions, whether it's the Catholics in the Philippines, Hindus in the Indian Subcontinent, or Orthodox Christians in the Balkans or in the Caucasus, you have friction, you have conflict, you have fighting. Let's not forget Africa, where you have the bloodiest of all ethnic and religious wars--that in southern Sudan, where up to five million Christians have been slaughtered over the past decade. In some cases a young nation may masquerade as being inspired by religion, whereas it is really driven by the 19th-century-style national romanticism and the desire to expand. This is certainly the case with the Albanians. But we must not overlook the inherently expansionist nature of Islam. It is not a “live-and-let-live” religion. It is rather peculiar in that it postulates eventual conquest and conversion of all non-believers as the duty and obligation of each and every Muslim. Even when they talk of “co-existence” it is for tactical reasons only, and not as strategic reconciliation with the neighbors who are different. Q: So what should we do in Kosovo? Withdraw? TRIFKOVIC: The involvement of the United States in the Balkans over the past decade, that had unfortunately started in the last year of Bush-senior's presidency, and then literally got out of control during the dreadful eight years of Clinton, had nothing to do with the U.S. national interest, nothing to do with peace in the Balkans, and nothing to do with stability in Europe. It had everything to do with four different things. One was the desire to continue the gradual encirclement of Russia that is always regarded by a segment of the decision-making community in Washington as The Enemy. The second ingredient was the desire of the Israeli amen-corner to throw the Serbs to the Islamic wolves and thus to at least partially atone for more than half-a-century of largely uncritical and axiomatic support for Israel that came from Washington. The third ingredient was the increasing importance of Turkey as the pillar of American regional strategy, and whose importance has increased with the discovery of the Caspian oil. One way of looking at the U.S. policy in the Balkans is as the Return of the Ottoman Empire, and the discovery of the Islamic element there as the ally. In Bosnia this was at the expense of the Serbs and Croats. In Kosovo, and in what threatens to become the Greater Albania, at the expense of the Serbs, Macedonians, and Greeks. The fourth ingredient, last but by no means least, is the desire to use the Balkans as some kind of laboratory for “multi-ethnic” experimentation. On the one hand the policy-makers say that Yugoslavia was untenable because of the allegedly irreconcilable differences among its constituent nations; but on the other hand some other multi-multi hybrids are deemed eminently desirable and supportable, such as “Bosnia” that is really the microcosm of Yugoslavia. There was a skewered geopolitical logic in all this. The U.S. policy was deliberately aimed at aggravating the situation in the Balkans, and preventing the peace in Bosnia when it could have been achieved in 1992. This is a matter of historical record, evidenced when the U.S. Ambassador in Belgrade, Warren Zimmerman, intervened to sabotage, to torpedo, the agreement reached in Lisbon by the European Union under Lord Carrington's chairmanship in February of '92. They were driving the Balkan crisis in accordance with their agenda: to create as many small, unviable, and inherently unstable entities--the Dayton Bosnia, Kosovo under the international protectorate, “independent” Macedonia today and “independent” Montenegro tomorrow, and then on to the “autonomous” Sanjak, “cantonized” Vojvodina, and so on. These unstable and weak entities will have only one thing in common: the demand for the continued presence of the United States, of U.S. troops, of U.S. money, and U.S. political influence, as the only bedrock of their existence. Everybody out there knows that the very moment the so-called international community loses interest in that part of the world, Bosnia will fall apart, Kosovo will revert to Serbian sovereignty, and things will be very much the way they would have been had there been no intervention from Washington. At the moment there isn't a single interest the United States has in the Balkans that is worth the bones of a single American soldier. Q: But on the whole, are you optimistic about the U.S. foreign policy under Bush? TRIFKOVIC: I am certainly more optimistic than I would have been had the alternative prevailed last November. But the battle for Bush's ear is far from over. There are some people on his team who give us some cause for alarm who belong to the neoconservative cabal within the Administration--in particular Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld and his deputy Paul Wolfowitz. To some extent Dick Cheney has also displayed certain tendencies typical of that camp, but I believe that he is more cool-headed. Colin Powell sounds and looks every inch a pragmatist, but the problem with him is the lack of a fully developed and coherent world outlook; the same applies to Condoleezza Rice. What I like about Bush is his essentially nativist skepticism about the importance of foreign affairs. Washingtonian pundits like to make jokes about his calling Greeks “Grecians” and talking about “East Timoreans.” I think this displays a rather healthy disdain for those far-away lands. The President who is confused about those potential hotspots where someone else might like to send a few squadrons of bombers, is also going to think twice whether that is indeed worth doing. My own main concern is that Bush has indicated more than once that he is prepared to let the experts run the show and tell him what needs to be done abroad. That's why it is important to select those experts wisely and to make sure that their world outlook and their approach to foreign affairs is rooted in well defined, clearly understood and pragmatic, empirically verifiable link between what they are doing abroad and what they claim they are doing. Q: How about Chronicles--how successful are you in presenting this point of view? TRIFKOVIC: In terms of the quality of its writing, and in its cultivation of the form of elegant and somewhat idiosyncratic essay, it is truly unique. It is also unique in its defense of the legacy of our civilization against the onslaught of one-worldism, multiculturalism, and political correctitude that threaten to destroy all that we hold dear. Some would call Chronicles “paleoconservative”--but I don't think that any “ism” adequately describes what I would say is the normal, sane outlook. Unless we uphold the value of tradition, and of real communities of people who are related to each other culturally and even genetically, we are entering the brave new world of atomized individuals in which no real culture will be possible, and no liberty will be feasible. Q: You are staging a panel about Bush's foreign policy at The Rockford Institute next Friday. Will these be some of your areas of concern? TRIFKOVIC: We will not be philosophizing on the meaning of history and the future of the Western civilization. We'll talk about very specific, down-to-earth issues, such as the National Missile Defense project, the relations with China, Russia, and the European allies, and also some of the issues we've discussed earlier, the disengagement from the Balkans--or, more precisely, the originally promised disengagement that now seems to be under something of a question mark. Q: Will you focus on the dangers of the United Nations? TRIFKOVIC: The problem is not so much the U.N. per se. It is an inherently weak organization, in that it is only as “strong” as the key players want it to be. The problem is that the proponents of the One World paradigm, the globalists of different colors and persuasions, have used the U.N. as a means of building institutions that might ultimately acquire a momentum of their own. A prime example is the so-called International Criminal Court, the ICC. That's why The Hague Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia is such a dangerous institution, and such an important precedent. Once you accept the principle of trans-national judicial instruments as legal and legitimate, you'll end up with international bodies that can override national traditions and national sovereignties. Instead of preventing genocide, the ICC--if established--will guarantee that those who run the show will be able to go around the world bombing people at will, intervening with impunity, and having a pseudo-legal cover for whatever they are doing. It is important to warn ordinary Americans against such quasi-idealistic projects. Copyright 2001, http://www.ChroniclesMagazine.org 928 N. Main St., Rockford, IL 61103 http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/News/Trifkovic/News%20&%20Views.htm |
| Ima si has da kaje drugo. Nali na sledvasthia den niama da bade ministar. Niama samo nie v Evropa da badem banannova rebublika , ia! |
| Лудостта и наглостта на Американското и Английското правителства нямат граници. Който познава историята в навечерието на втората световна война и наглостта на правителството на Хитлер може много лесно да направи паралел. Жалко, много жалко, защото с всеки изминал ден човечеството се приближава до най- страшната човешка трагедия предвидена от толкова ясновидци, трагедия в която ще загинат милиарди невинни хора. Обърнете внимания, че предсказанията на Ванга направени преди повече от 20 години за разпадането на соц. системата вече е история, а замърсяване на въздъха и водните източници на планетата е на дневен ред." Ще има храна, но тя ще бъде отровена" За информация на русофобите, тя не посочва Америка като спасител на света, кой знае пък може и да е била русофилка. |
| Novite Jugo-marionetki - predatelite na Sarbija sa saschtite kurvi kakvito sa i Bulgarskite predateli ......Judite komunsiti , kato Lea Koen , Bojkov 10% , Solomon Pasi i zjalata kohorta , turzi , pomazi i chujdopoklonizi jivjali i klali s privlegiu Bulgarsku narod ! ================================================ TRAGI-KOMEDIJATA PO USA-EU-SZENARII ZAPOCHVA ..... NARODA SI STRADA , NO KATO NEZNAJAT DA SE ZASCHTITAVAT . SCHTE JADAT GOVNA ! SMART NA USA-JUDEISKTE PRESTAPNIZI......SEGA NE SE GOVORI ZA PALESTINSKU NAROD .....A SA SLOBODAN DETO SE PROTIVOPOSTAVI NA "VELIJU USA - UBIEZ"......TE IMALI INTERESI PO ZELUR SVJAT VIJ SLEDVASCHTITE INTERNET ADRESI ! STEFAN D-R DIMTER TCHOLAKOV 2 APIRL 2001 Na tozi den sam pravil vo Vraza naomera na BKP-polizia za sazdavane na PRATIJATA NA ZELENATA MASA I ME izgoniha za disiden vo chujbina ......BKP poslucshnite kopileta nachelo s JUDITE komunisti sega sa USA-pirjateli i podarjnizi na novio svetoven red...... SAVETITE SA VINOVNI , CHE DOPUSNAHA TAZI PRIVILIGIROVANA IZMET DA SE POLZVA S PRIVILEGII ; I SEGA DA TROVI PAK HARODITE PO SVETA ! Smart na novata USA-demokrazia . Tova ne e demokrazia , a USA-Judeiski faschizam ! SVERIGE ============================================= JUDISK REALITET I SIDNI-AUSTRALIA Namn (obligatoriskt): STEFAN TCHOLAKOV-VÄXJÖ http://www.sydneyeruv.org.au/boundary.htm STEFAN D-R DINMITER TCHOLAKOV KUNG_CHOLI@YAHOO.SE 1 APRIL 2001 SVERIGE Име: TCHOLI STIVN D-R DE Email: KUNG_CHOLI@YAHOO.SE Дата: 02.04.2001 17:31 Лична страница: http://se.photos.yahoo.com/kung_choli ================================================= Rubrik: http://www.orthodox.kuban.ru/ Namn (obligatoriskt): STEFAN TCHLAKOV-VÄXJÖ http://www.orthodox.kuban.ru/ http://www.orthodox.kuban.ru/ Wed Mar 28 11:34:50 2001 http://www.orthodox.kuban.ru/ NAPOMNJANE OT MINALOTO ! OTVORI SLEDVASCHTIJAT ADRES : http://www.orthodox.kuban.ru/ http://www.orthodox.kuban.ru/Kosovo.htm http://www.decani.yunet.com/ http://www.orthodox.kuban.ru/Crucif.htm STEFAN d-r DIMITER TCHOLAKOV KUNG_CHOLI@YAHOO.SE 28 MART 2001   |
Добави мнение Мнения:6