БРЕКЗИТ
Отиди на страница:
закани и заплахи. И кое е закана и заплаха, любезни? Всеизвестни изрази не знаеш. "Копаеш дъното", означава "говориш невъобразими глупости", или "продължаваш неконтролируемото си падение".   | |
Редактирано: 2 пъти. Последна промяна от: Туткалчев |
И все пак ме гризе червеят на съмнението - как един избран чрез представителство европарламент ще е по-демократичен и по-контролируем от пряко избрания .... |
Win or Lose, the Brexit Vote Shows How Hard It Is to Defend the EU The public position of the Labour leadership (there are some doubts about the private views of the present party leader, Jeremy Corbyn) is that Labour wants Britain to remain within “a reformed EU.” A reformed EU is presumably one that would promote Labour’s social democratic values. But nobody has suggested how this reform is going to be accomplished. It is, in fact, very difficult indeed to reform the EU. There are 28 member states, with very diverse economic interests and, at any one moment governments of sharply differing political complexions. A change to the rules on freedom of movement, for example, will be welcomed by some but bitterly opposed by others. Nobody in the Remain campaign is singing the praises of the European Parliament, or arguing, as some academics have done, that “European democracy” is a goal worth striving for. The EU is commended for what it delivers — economic stability according to the right, workers’ rights and environmental protection according to the left — but not for the manner in which it does so. The dystopian vision of Europe as a top-down bureaucratic machine thus goes unchallenged. Although Britain’s elites have failed to offer the public any reason to think highly of the existing EU, it should come as no surprise that some Britons have started to indulge in speculation about future European arrangements. Some have expressed the extraordinarily optimistic view, for instance, that a vote by the U.K. to leave might create such a political upheaval across Europe that the EU would be forced to reconstitute itself as a looser alliance among nations that no longer attempted to harmonize and regulate the internal affairs of its member states. National governments would take back powers deemed essential by their citizens, including the right to control borders. An EU like this would be one that most Britons would happily join — or rejoin, as it were, in a second referendum. For more: https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/06/22/win-or-lose-the-brexit-vote-shows-how-hard-it-is-to-defend-the-eu/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=New%20Campaign&utm_term=Flashpoints |
| Ефрейторът не знаел, завалията, какви реформи да прави! EU's Juncker after Brexit: "Everyone wants EU reforms - but what reforms?" http://in.reuters.com/article/britain-eu-juncker-idINKCN0ZH4UG?rpc=401 | |
Редактирано: 1 път. Последна промяна от: Туткалчев |
| massive read, тук всяка страна може да си намери нещо, с което да млати отсрещната. Натисни тук |
EU's Juncker after Brexit: "Everyone wants EU reforms - but what reforms?" HR reforms. Now all your company in Bruxelles and Strassbourg are a bouquet of thistles. Good for asses. | |
Редактирано: 1 път. Последна промяна от: Дорис |
"Everyone wants EU reforms - but what reforms?" Това, комай, е въпросът на въпросите. На всички мераци за реформа, не само в ЕС. Идеята, че като сменим хората всичко ще се оправи, е наивна. Би трябвало да сме го осъзнали, особено от 2009-а насам. |
Би трябвало да сме го осъзнали, особено от 2009-а насам. Що пък от 2009?!? Да не би тогава Хегел да е систематизирал философските тези на предшественицине си за ролята на личността в историята? | |
Редактирано: 1 път. Последна промяна от: Bacho Кольо |
